Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Jose Statham vs Strong Kirchheimer Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Statham vs Kirchheimer analysis and find out who is favored!
Jose Statham vs Strong Kirchheimer Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Statham 1 - 0 Kirchheimer
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Statham has won 53.61% of points on their second serve, while Kirchheimer has won 51.29%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Statham, in recent form, has won 52.11% of their opponent's second serve points, while Kirchheimer has won 47.72%. The same stats for first serve returns are 24.7% and 30.47% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Statham has saved 55% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Kirchheimer has saved 60.93% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Statham has won 36.84% of matches played (W/L 14/ 24), with Kirchheimer winning 51.61% (W/L 32/ 30) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Statham has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 61% (W/L 19/ 12), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 40% (W/L 4/ 6). Kirchheimer has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 57% (W/L 53/ 40), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 56% (W/L 152/ 118).
- Player level: In the last year, Statham has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 34.38% of matches (W/L 11/ 21), where as Kirchheimer has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 47.62% of matches (W/L 20/ 22). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Statham winning 1 times and Kirchheimer being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Statham winning 2 and Kirchheimer winning 0. The last match between Statham and Kirchheimer was at the Canada F7, 06-09-2016, First, Clay with Jose Statham getting the victory 6-1 6-3.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:23:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Statham and Kirchheimer have played a deciding set 0 times, with Statham winning 0 times and Kirchheimer 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Statham winning 0, and Kirchheimer 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Statham has played against opponents with an average rank of 346 while Kirchheimer has played against players with an average rank of 263.73.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Statham has won 27% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Kirchheimer has won 47% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Statham has converted 47.62% of breakpoint opportunities, and Kirchheimer has converted 40% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
693
Rank
279
High
37
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
482
Rank
375
High
29
Age
R
Plays
W
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
L
L
Form
L
L
L
W
W
L
W
W
W
L
57% (604-455)
Career Total W/L
56% (278-216)
36% (4-7)
YTD W/L
46% (11-13)
$33,515
Career Prize Money
$3,990
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Jose Statham vs Strong Kirchheimer For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Statham VS Kirchheimer
Sportsbook
Offer
Statham VS Kirchheimer H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | Jose Statham | Strong Kirchheimer |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 4 |
| Aces (Total) | 4 | 1 |
| DFs (Total) | 0 | 1 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:23:0 | 1:23:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 65% (32/49) | 74% (39/53) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 75% (24/32) | 59% (23/39) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 59% (10/17) | 21% (3/14) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 31% (4/13) | 0% (0/1) |
| Return Points W% | 51% (27/53) | 31% (15/49) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Statham VS Kirchheimer H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-1 6-3 |
Stats 
Jose Statham
Player
Strong Kirchheimer
65%
(
32 of
49)
1st Serve %
74%
(
39 of
53)
4
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
31%
(
15 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
27 of
53)
61
Total Points Won
41
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Jose Statham | Strong Kirchheimer |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 36% (4/7) | 46% (11/13) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 46% (12/14) | 50% (28/28) |
| Games Win/Loss | 48% (129/138) | 49% (253/261) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 38% (3/5) | 58% (7/5) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 33% (1/2) | 33% (2/4) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 33% (2/4) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.35 | 0.41 |
| Aces Total | 46 | 102 |
| DFs per game | 0.31 | 0.25 |
| DFs Total | 40 | 63 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:32:2 | 1:46:39 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 304.45 | 341.08 |
| 1st Serve % | 58% (405/696) | 61% (988/1610) |
| 1st Serve W% | 69% (280/405) | 70% (689/988) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 54% (156/291) | 51% (319/622) |
| BPs Won% Total | 48% (20/42) | 40% (58/145) |
| Return Pts W% | 35% (238/674) | 37% (606/1628) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 36% (4/7) | 44% (7/9) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (4/4) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 36% (4/11) | 46% (11/24) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 67% (4/6) | 50% (3/6) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/4) | 25% (2/8) |
| 1st set W, W | 80% (5/4) | 69% (13/9) |
| 1st set W, L | 20% (5/1) | 31% (13/4) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (6/0) | 18% (11/2) |
Jose Statham Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | 7-5 7-6(6) | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
James McCabe
Player
Jose Statham
60%
(
31 of
52)
1st Serve %
62%
(
31 of
50)
9
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
87%
(
27 of
31)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
12 of
19)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
25%
(
13 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
19 of
50)
58
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Dominik Palan
Player
Jose Statham
65%
(
62 of
95)
1st Serve %
66%
(
60 of
91)
12
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
0
79%
(
49 of
62)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
37 of
60)
45%
(
15 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
31 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
35 of
91)
99
Total Points Won
87
|
6-2 6-7(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jose Statham
Player
Mats Rosenkranz
86%
(
32 of
37)
1st Serve %
50%
(
25 of
50)
7
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
5
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
19 of
25)
80%
(
4 of
5)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
19%
(
7 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
22 of
50)
52
Total Points Won
35
|
6-4 4-3 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Evan Zhu
Player
Jose Statham
62%
(
64 of
104)
1st Serve %
54%
(
58 of
108)
6
Aces
7
10
Double Faults
6
75%
(
48 of
64)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
37 of
58)
40%
(
16 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
30 of
50)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
38%
(
40 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
41 of
108)
105
Total Points Won
107
|
7-6(5) 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Nick Chappell
Player
Jose Statham
55%
(
53 of
96)
1st Serve %
48%
(
52 of
108)
11
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
13
72%
(
38 of
53)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
37 of
52)
56%
(
24 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
31 of
56)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
35%
(
34 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
40 of
108)
102
Total Points Won
102
|
6-4 3-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Juan Bautista Torres
Player
Jose Statham
74%
(
37 of
50)
1st Serve %
60%
(
28 of
47)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
76%
(
28 of
37)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
20 of
28)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
13 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
22 of
47)
59
Total Points Won
38
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 7-5 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Colin Sinclair
Player
Jose Statham
63%
(
55 of
88)
1st Serve %
54%
(
59 of
110)
13
Aces
8
4
Double Faults
11
82%
(
45 of
55)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
41 of
59)
55%
(
18 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
26 of
51)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
28%
(
25 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
43 of
110)
106
Total Points Won
92
|
6-7(2) 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jose Statham
Player
Masamichi Imamura
65%
(
53 of
82)
1st Serve %
74%
(
53 of
72)
5
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
2
70%
(
37 of
53)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
33 of
53)
45%
(
13 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
39%
(
32 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
31 of
72)
81
Total Points Won
73
|
6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
view more
Strong Kirchheimer Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF |
Stats
Oliver Tarvet
Player
Strong Kirchheimer
52%
(
22 of
42)
1st Serve %
58%
(
28 of
48)
6
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
82%
(
18 of
22)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
17 of
28)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
12 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
25 of
48)
55
Total Points Won
35
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Strong Kirchheimer
Player
Collin Altamirano
65%
(
31 of
48)
1st Serve %
56%
(
32 of
57)
4
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
5
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
76%
(
13 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
23%
(
11 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
30 of
57)
67
Total Points Won
38
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Strong Kirchheimer
Player
Colton Smith
56%
(
44 of
78)
1st Serve %
71%
(
58 of
82)
0
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
3
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
31 of
58)
50%
(
17 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
41%
(
32 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
41 of
82)
87
Total Points Won
73
|
7-6(3) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Strong Kirchheimer
Player
Bryce Nakashima
60%
(
24 of
40)
1st Serve %
58%
(
31 of
53)
0
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
4
71%
(
17 of
24)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
75%
(
12 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
28%
(
11 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
28 of
53)
57
Total Points Won
36
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mitchell Krueger
Player
Strong Kirchheimer
60%
(
31 of
52)
1st Serve %
51%
(
28 of
55)
4
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
2
84%
(
26 of
31)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
18 of
28)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
27%
(
14 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
25 of
55)
63
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Strong Kirchheimer
Player
Leo Borg
57%
(
28 of
49)
1st Serve %
69%
(
50 of
72)
4
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
3
79%
(
22 of
28)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
28 of
50)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
14 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
34 of
72)
69
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Strong Kirchheimer
Player
Andres Urrea
56%
(
22 of
39)
1st Serve %
59%
(
30 of
51)
6
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
86%
(
19 of
22)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
20 of
30)
82%
(
14 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
15%
(
6 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
23 of
51)
56
Total Points Won
34
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Axel Nefve
Player
Strong Kirchheimer
59%
(
38 of
64)
1st Serve %
64%
(
44 of
69)
4
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
3
84%
(
32 of
38)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
32 of
44)
65%
(
17 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
23%
(
15 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
24 of
69)
73
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Elijah Poritzky
Player
Strong Kirchheimer
61%
(
60 of
98)
1st Serve %
72%
(
61 of
85)
2
Aces
11
8
Double Faults
5
68%
(
41 of
60)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
39 of
61)
45%
(
17 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
41%
(
40 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
38 of
85)
96
Total Points Won
87
|
6-4 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Patrick Maloney
Player
Strong Kirchheimer
76%
(
39 of
51)
1st Serve %
60%
(
29 of
48)
2
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
1
79%
(
31 of
39)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
23 of
29)
75%
(
9 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
11 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
17 of
48)
57
Total Points Won
42
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Statham Vs Kirchheimer Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Statham are available here and Kirchheimer photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
